Comments on: What’s more important in SEO, content or links? http://www.stuckonseo.co.uk/whats-more-important-in-seo-content-or-links-1125.html Internet marketing services Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:23:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Dave Ashworth http://www.stuckonseo.co.uk/whats-more-important-in-seo-content-or-links-1125.html/comment-page-1#comment-212 Dave Ashworth Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:01:29 +0000 http://www.stuckonseo.co.uk/?p=1125#comment-212 Whether a budget is limited or not, I'd say content is more important - as this will attract natural links over time if it is good content and will help your website to acheive it's goals - whereas buying links may well help your site to rank, but if the content is poor and doesn't result in the desired user action once on the site, then what is the point in the ranking? I totally agree with the final statement, content = links = rankings. Whether a budget is limited or not, I’d say content is more important – as this will attract natural links over time if it is good content and will help your website to acheive it’s goals – whereas buying links may well help your site to rank, but if the content is poor and doesn’t result in the desired user action once on the site, then what is the point in the ranking?

I totally agree with the final statement, content = links = rankings.

]]>